An insider has revealed that the sale of some of the Queen's beloved horses has caused considerable discontent among members of the royal family. The horses are more than just property, they are a legacy and a tribute to Queen Elizabeth. The horses, many of which were raised under her careful supervision, represent her commitment to British tradition. Their sale was seen by some as a disrespect to her legacy, leading to feelings of sadness and anger among those close to the monarch. Princess Anne, known for her strong commitment to royal duties, has spoken out against the sale.

She sees it as an insult to her mother's memory and values. Her love of horse riding only added to her frustration with the controversial decision. Insiders claim that Princess Anne privately warned King Charles about the potential damage this could do to the reputation of the monarchy. She stressed the need to protect symbols that have been important to the royal family for generations. Elizabeth’s passion for horses began when she received her first pony, Peggy, from her grandfather at the age of four.

Over the years, her knowledge of horse care has grown, earning her the respect of equestrian experts around the world. The Queen’s horses have played a key role in royal ceremonies, highlighting events such as Trooping the Colour and the State Opening of Parliament. The animals have become an iconic symbol of her reign. Camilla's decision to auction off more than a dozen of her horses, including two with particular sentimental value, has been criticised by palace insiders who see it as a hasty cash grab.

While Camilla sees the horses as relics of the past, others argue they should be preserved as lasting links to Queen Elizabeth's legacy. The controversy has raised questions about the financial motives behind the sale, with some royal watchers accusing Camilla of choosing practicality over sentiment. The timing of the sale, so soon after the Queen's death, has fuelled speculation about tensions within the royal family. Reports have suggested that Camilla felt left out of the division of Queen Elizabeth's fortune, especially after learning that much of her jewellery collection had been left to Princess Catherine. This sense of exclusion may have led her to view the horses as a burden rather than a valuable legacy.

Critics say this view ignores the Queen’s deep connection to her equestrian heritage. King Charles’s support of Camilla’s decision added to the strained relationship. Although he shared his mother’s appreciation for horses, his support for the sale showed a preference for finance over tradition. Camilla was persuaded by stressing the cost and need to keep the horses, seeing the sale as a necessity. Princess Anne, however, felt the symbolic importance of the horses far outweighed their monetary value.